[OKC JUG] Guidance
Ivan Zhidov
izhidov at gmail.com
Mon Jun 2 14:50:46 PDT 2008
Rod Johnson is right and wrong. There's no 'correct' way to do
something, it always depends on what kind of environment the project
exists in including budget, team (experience), objectives, requirements
etc. Given Jackie environment, I do not see a knowledge expert / mentor
type around (assumption) so it will be less headache to do it the
'wrong' way and get the app done fairly fast plus teach Jackie how not
to do things ;)
Ivan
Jason Lee wrote:
> Ivan Zhidov wrote:
>> Given Jackie's experience I would suggest a low-tech approach of
>> creating a simple JSP-based aplication that processes the uploaded file
>> using the existing validation logic and presents the user with the
>> output text file with listed errors. If no errors were encountered the
>> data shall be persisted in the database.
>
> IMO, no should ever use JSP. Ever. If Rod Johnson is right and using
> JDBC (directly) should be a sackable offense, using JSP should get you
> night in the iron maiden... :P On a more serious note, a JSP approach
> will either teach and/or require bad practices, or require much more
> work (IMO) to handle getting the data, processing, doing forwards,
> etc. Since NetBeans is in the mix, heavy dependence on its wizards,
> etc. should grease the skids a good deal on the framework side.
>
>> The idea is to re-use as much of the existing process as possible and
>> deploy it with very little effort. Jetty or Tomcat should be sufficient.
>
> Jetty, though, will require more work to set up, since it is not
> integrated into the IDE. NetBeans 6 *does*, though, support Tomcat 6,
> something I had forgotten about, so that might be an option, depending
> on what the app is using (i.e., other JEE technologies, which I doubt,
> given what has been said so far).
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: izhidov.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 86 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/jug-okcjug.org/attachments/20080602/74213ebb/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Jug
mailing list