[Steering Committee] okc jug evals - part deaux

Brian Sheldon brian_s_sheldon at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 17 03:19:26 PDT 2007


re: separate sign-in sheet - some people may not be as truthful if they have to put their name on the eval. I guess that would also mean we go back to using the tickets for the drawing... hmmm. maybe we should talk about it, huh?

Brian

----- Original Message ----
From: Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com>
To: OKC JUG Steering Committee Mailing List <sc at lists.okcjug.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 9:06:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Steering Committee] okc jug evals - part deaux

On 8/16/07, Brian Sheldon <brian_s_sheldon at yahoo.com> wrote:
I think we might want to have a sign-in sheet and take the name/email off the evals.

Why is that?  Not getting many evals turned in?



I'm gonna change the -good, bad, ugly - to something else, like good-fair-bad or from 1 to 10 - 1 bad and 10 is excellent...


I've been meaning to redo those, but I haven't had the chance.  This last month has been too busy.  The next will be as well, as I get to start my presentation for September from scratch. :P  

Ryan, my team has another meeting the week of the September JUG.  I don't think I'll have to go to that one, but you might keep that in mind until I can verify, which will be Monday I hope.

-- 
Jason Lee, SCJP
Software Architect -- Objectstream, Inc.
JSF RI Dev Team
http://blogs.steeplesoft.com


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/sc-okcjug.org/attachments/20070817/a4a9db61/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the sc mailing list