[Steering Committee] [OKC JUG] meeting suggestions and other stuff
Brandon N. Burk
brandon.burk at gmail.com
Fri May 23 06:52:12 PDT 2008
Well said Jason. I agree with what you and Shoe have mentioned regarding
organizational and individual commitment.
I used to prefer the evening meetings due to the relaxed schedule and
conversation. I felt that the lunch meetings were too difficult to commit to
because of hectic work schedules (i.e. meetings). Then I had a kid--ditching
my wife and baby for several more hours after a work day was more difficult.
The lunch meetings became the better of the two options despite meaning less
time to catch up with colleagues and less time for Q&A during presentations.
Fast forward a year. The kiddo is getting older and my wife doesn't need the
break as much as she used to; the work schedule is busier than before. So
I'm back to wishing that evenings were "where its at" for good material and
energized conversation. It just so happens my team's iteration wrap-up and
planning meeting lands on Tuesdays, so that's already interfered with our
ability to make the lunch sessions.
In other words; everyone is going to have unique (and changing) needs in
their schedules. It is up to the individual to make the commitment to
increasing their "knowledge portfolio".*
Have a fantastic long-weekend!
Brandon
*Term borrowed from Matt Smith
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Brian Sheldon <brian.s.sheldon at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So I guess we'll wait for the next steering committee meeting to make any
>> decisions on this? the thread has gone cold....
>>
>
> Sorry, Brian. There's a lot hanging out there that needs to be addressed
> (iirc), and I have a couple of items of my own that I'd like to bring up,
> but I'll do that in another thread. :)
>
> When we only had evening meetings, we used to have 30 minutes to talk with
> each other and get to know people. I guess now we can arrive early and/or
> stay late. Any other suggestions?
>
> As much as I've loved the success in terms of numbers with the lunch
> meeting, holding the meeting at that time really does limit what we can do.
> We can schedule the lunch meeting for two hours and devote 30 minutes of
> that to networking, with the rest going to the normal meeting, for example,
> but that's taking liberties with everyone's employer's time that we really
> shouldn't. I can probably swing the two hours, but I'd have to make it up
> at some point, but some employers aren't quite as flexible.
>
> Doing this in the evening might help, but if this is the only thing
> happening in the evening (or this plus our trial Nerdlings concept), we may
> not get the numbers to make it truly effective. A third option (which I was
> going to address in The Other Email, but I'll go ahead and do it here) is to
> switch back to evenings only. From what I've gathered from the JUG leaders
> list as well the leaders I talked to JavaOne, this is the approach that most
> JUGs take. Of course, they usually link their meetings to hitting a bar
> somewhere afterwards -- something others here are free to do, I guess. :P
> The downside is that might affect our attendance numbers. Personally, I'm
> not too worried about the numbers. I want the JUG to be effective first,
> and big second (or fifteenth). I'm not necessarily sold on or advocating
> the idea, but it's something worth thinking about: Does switching back to
> evenings only offer enough benefit to justify the major change in schedule?
>
> * Send out requests of what is useful for next meeting
> I'm not sure what this really means. If you want to see a presentation on
> some in particular, send an email to the group.
>
> This may mean something like "You need to be familiar with these concepts"
> or "Bring a laptop if you have one" etc. Total guess. Personally, it seems
> a careful reader should be able to glean that from the session abstract,
> but, if someone is asking for clarity there, we probably need to make some
> adjustments, as we're to help, right? Granted, you can't help everyone, but
> this doesn't seem too onerous.
>
> * UoP is far from the FAA
> I agree with this. but - We had several lunch meetings at the Francis
> Tuttle at Reno and Rockwell in the hopes that people from the FAA would show
> up. I don't think we had many (if any) show up. Do we want to try and have
> some meetings down at FT again? The rooms are free at FT.
>
> I may have already said this, but I agree with... Brett's (?) assessment:
> We can't cater specifically to one organization. To a certain extent, and
> organization has to be willing to put some effort into the JUG (or, for that
> matter, training its own people) to make things really effective. We're at
> UoP because it's affordable, and fairly centrally located (at FT, we
> alienated a bunch of Edmond people, for example). While I'm certainly open
> to new locations (see The Other Email), intentionally moving closer to one
> specific organization just to be closer to it doesn't make sense.
>
> I think that's it here. I'll get to work on The Other soon... :)
>
> fyi - the next sc meeting is scheduled for May 26th - which, for me, is a
>> holiday. I suggest we move it.....
>>
>> brian
>>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Jason McIntosh <jwmcintosh at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This sounds interesting, and seems like with Mark's proposed format we
>>> could do it at a lunch meeting. If people want to hang around after to
>>> continue discussions that would be fine.
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Brian Sheldon <
>>> brian.s.sheldon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree too.
>>>>
>>>> So now the question is where and when.
>>>>
>>>> We could do this before or after the June 10th lunch meeting
>>>> - or -
>>>> we could do this sometime at the June 10th evening meeting (but no one
>>>> shows up for those - maybe they would for this?)
>>>> -or-
>>>> we could do this on some other date.
>>>>
>>>> If we did this on some other date, would we want to meet at UoP? If so,
>>>> who would pay for the room? We could do this at Francis Tuttle at Reno and
>>>> Rockwell - last time we used FT it was free. I'll be happy to set it up with
>>>> FT if that's what we decide.
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Mitch Blevins <Blevins at iecokc.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Seconded. (or thirded)
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: jug-bounces at lists.okcjug.org [mailto:
>>>>> jug-bounces at lists.okcjug.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Zhidov
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:40 AM
>>>>> To: jug at lists.okcjug.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [OKC JUG] meeting suggestions and other stuff
>>>>>
>>>>> You got my vote. This is a different format, sounds interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Smith wrote:
>>>>> > Could we have meeting where people from different places do a 5
>>>>> minute presentation of how java is being used in different places, this is
>>>>> 30 minutes and then 30 minutes of then mixing and talking about with each
>>>>> other. People could have name tags that say where they work so if we hear
>>>>> that the FAA is using OSGi, I could find an FAA person and ask them
>>>>> questions about it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Mark
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ________________________________
>>>>> >
>>>>> > From: jug-bounces at lists.okcjug.org on behalf of Brian Sheldon
>>>>> > Sent: Tue 5/13/2008 8:42 PM
>>>>> > To: okcjug mainlist
>>>>> > Subject: [OKC JUG] meeting suggestions and other stuff
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Sorry there wasn't any vegie pizza today. Pizza Hut screwed up the
>>>>> order. GDH did ask for some vegie pizza's.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "Why did they invent Velveeta? So that vegetarians could have Spam
>>>>> too."
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Here are some of the comments on the evals today:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * (need) time to network
>>>>> >
>>>>> > When we only had evening meetings, we used to have 30 minutes to talk
>>>>> with each other and get to know people. I guess now we can arrive early
>>>>> and/or stay late. Any other suggestions?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * Send out requests of what is useful for next meeting
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm not sure what this really means. If you want to see a
>>>>> presentation on some in particular, send an email to the group.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * UoP is far from the FAA
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I agree with this. but - We had several lunch meetings at the Francis
>>>>> Tuttle at Reno and Rockwell in the hopes that people from the FAA would show
>>>>> up. I don't think we had many (if any) show up. Do we want to try and have
>>>>> some meetings down at FT again? The rooms are free at FT.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Here are some of the suggested topics for future meetings:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * Grid
>>>>> > * GWT
>>>>> > * Web Services
>>>>> > * ESB
>>>>> > * BPEL
>>>>> > * Spring
>>>>> > * JSF (a lot of these)
>>>>> > * OSGI
>>>>> > * Seam
>>>>> > * JPA
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Brian
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Jug mailing list
>>>>> > Jug at lists.okcjug.org
>>>>> > http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/jug-okcjug.org
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Jug mailing list
>>>>> Jug at lists.okcjug.org
>>>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/jug-okcjug.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Jug mailing list
>>>> Jug at lists.okcjug.org
>>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/jug-okcjug.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jug mailing list
>>> Jug at lists.okcjug.org
>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/jug-okcjug.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jug mailing list
>> Jug at lists.okcjug.org
>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/jug-okcjug.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jason Lee, SCJP
> Software Architect -- Objectstream, Inc.
> Mojarra and Mojarra Scales Dev Team
> https://mojarra.dev.java.net
> https://scales.dev.java.net
> http://blogs.steeplesoft.com
> _______________________________________________
> sc mailing list
> sc at lists.okcjug.org
> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
> http://wiki.okcjug.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/sc-okcjug.org/attachments/20080523/6ef20061/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sc
mailing list