[Steering Committee] A Change Proposal

Thu May 28 08:10:45 PDT 2009

looks good to me. even with the word ameliorate. "why use a large word when
a diminutive one will do?"
I guess there is one more option that I doubt we want, but, we could meet at
Francis Tuttle (reno & ?mcarthur?) .  I don't think they would charge us for
meeting there.

Another topic for another email - fundraising? sell stuff at the meetings -
cookies, shirts, mugs, etc. I'm not sure if that would complicate our
accounting/taxes though.

bsssssssssss

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Paul Smith <paul0731 at gmail.com> wrote:

> 1) Use reverse pyramid, ie most important points first, and work down to
> least important.  People must likely won't read all of this email. I think
> loosing a sponsor, and sponsors harder to come by is rather important.
> 2) Loose the word ameliorate.
> 3) You did a better job writing this than I could have done.
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, fellas.  Proof-reading time.  I'd like to send this out today or
>> tomorrow, so please give me feedback as soon as possible.  Thanks!
>>
>>
>> =====
>>
>> One of the things we in the JUG leadership have always tried to stress is
>> that this is *our* group.  While there may be a few of us making the
>> decisions, all are welcome to come to the meeting and help us make those
>> decisions, even taking over leadership if so desired.  That being the case,
>> we try to operate the JUG with complete transparently.  To that end, I'd
>> like to take some time to discuss the state of things concerning our group.
>>
>> As you may recall, late last year, we incorporated the JUG, which, among
>> other things, has allowed us to open and maintain a bank account.  As a
>> result of that move and the resulting, if meager, account balance, we have
>> been able to entertain larger, more long-term arrangements.  One such
>> arrangement, which we're still in the process of finalizing, is a
>> multi-month agreement with the Oklahoma City Coworking Collaborative, or
>> CoCo.  As many of you have seen, Derrick and his team have built a fantastic
>> facility in downtown Oklahoma City that solves a number of issues for us,
>> the most pressing of which has been space.  At several of our last meetings
>> at the University of Phoenix, we were standing room only.  To ameliorate
>> that issue there would have doubled our costs.  The CoCo gives us much more
>> room, at only a modest increase in costs.  The CoCo also provides for the
>> recording and hosting of meeting videos, as well as a more central location,
>> which helps out those on the south side of the city.
>>
>> For those reasons, we feel such a partnership with the CoCo is a boon to
>> the JUG.  At the same time, we are able to help out Derrick and crew who
>> have been very active and supportive of not only the JUG, but several other
>> user groups in the area.  The catch is that such an agreement requires an
>> upfront payment for the facilities rental, which is a normal and not
>> unreasonable arrangement.  What that means is that the lion's share of our
>> current funds are now committed to this partnership, leaving us with only a
>> small sum left.  Seeing this small amount, the SC discussed Tuesday what we
>> should do to make sure that we can continue to operate.  While it is true
>> that in the past we've gone month to month in our funding, given the
>> volatility in the market and the loss of one of our sponsors, we feel that
>> it would be prudent to take steps to insure that we're not spending money we
>> may not get in the future.
>>
>> Having said all of that, we came up with a number of options for the
>> membership to discuss, select, etc.  Aside from the facilities rental, we
>> have two other regular expenses, door prizes and food.  With food being the
>> larger of the two, our proposals focused on that.  They are:
>>
>> 1) We no longer provide lunch, and expect each attendee to bring his
>> lunch.
>> 2) We continue to provide lunch, but require that each attendee pay a flat
>> fee for lunch, say, $5.
>> 3) We move to a paid membership model, wherein members would continue to
>> get a "free" meal at each meeting but non-members would be required to pay
>> for the meal at each meeting.
>> 4) Someone in the group donates the food. Or, alternately, the
>> entrepreneurial might find a nice business opportunity here.
>> 5) Continue business as usual and then suspend operations should funding
>> dry up.
>>
>> There are likely other options.  If one comes to mind, please feel free to
>> propose it.  We decided that, given the time frame, nothing will change for
>> the June meeting, but, starting with the July meeting, one of these
>> proposals (or, perhaps, one suggested by the general membership) will be
>> implemented, so if you have a strong feeling one way or another, now is the
>> time to make your voice heard.  The decision on which option to adopt will
>> likely be made at next month's Steering Committee meeting, so if you've been
>> thinking about coming, now is the time.  That's the best way to get involved
>> in the decision-making process for the JUG.
>>
>> Our hope, of course, is the economy begins to swing back up and that our
>> awesome local sponsors will still be in the position to partner with us.
>>  While there may be signs showing that that will happen in the near term, we
>> felt it best not to do "deficit spending" and implement a strategy to insure
>> the continued operations of the JUG.  All of us on the SC feel that we get
>> value from the JUG, hoping, of course, that everyone else feels the same, so
>> it is in the best interest of all involved that the JUG continue to meet.
>>  It is our hope that this proposal will do just that.
>>
>> Thanks for taking the time to read this giant missive.  Your feedback is
>> greatly welcome.
>>
>> Jason Lee, SCJP
>> Senior Java Developer, Sun Microsystems
>> Mojarra and Mojarra Scales Dev Team
>> https://mojarra.dev.java.net
>> https://scales.dev.java.net
>> http://blogs.steeplesoft.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc mailing list
>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc mailing list
> sc at lists.okcjug.org
> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
> http://wiki.okcjug.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>
>

-- 
Brian

http://bubbasslagheapnpdeli.blogspot.com
http://www.au.org
http://www.venganza.org
Twitter id  @okieBubba
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/sc-okcjug.org/attachments/20090528/6f0008eb/attachment.htm>