[Steering Committee] Annual JUG sponsorship

[Mitch Blevins]

Maybe we were using crappy Java-based polling software before?

-Mitch

On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:22 AM, "Brett L. Schuchert"  
<schuchert at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Let's try voting again. In the past there has not been a lot of  
> traction, but I think it's worth putting it out there. Best case, we  
> get raised interest. Worst case, we don't get information.
>
> Brett
> On Sep 20, 2009, at 8:04 PM 9/20/09, Ivan Zhidov wrote:
>
>> Voting should encourage other members participation. If a smaller  
>> group of people sets the agenda, it will be harder to find that  
>> 'sweet spot' as more experienced developers, 'elders' will forgo  
>> some of the topics interesting to the others. If there's only one  
>> presenter volunteering then there's no reason to set up a poll but  
>> I noticed typically there are 2-3 ideas being discussed by SC. Also  
>> along with the poll there should be a way for members to request  
>> certain topics. Another thing I like is when members post their  
>> development issues to the list and there's a group discussion.
>>
>> On a related topic I'll try to make it CoCo for the 'code-off'  
>> Brett put together, at least as an observer as I like seeing  
>> multiple perspectives applied to solving the problem since often  
>> many of us tend to get set in their ways.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc mailing list
>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc mailing list
> sc at lists.okcjug.org
> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
> http://wiki.okcjug.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/