[Steering Committee] Annual JUG sponsorship

[Brett L. Schuchert]

So it looks like I misinterpreted what I read in Ryan's email. That's  
clearly my mistake, so I apologize.

As I think I mentioned previously, I'd be happy with a larger pool of  
presenters and larger attendance at the steering committee meetings.

As for whether some is or is not qualified, that's actually never come  
up as far as I am aware. And in fact, my issue was not regarding  
qualification but rather subject matter.

Since we are not giving away guaranteed speaking spots, my issues are  
resolved.

Sorry if I jumped the gun.

Brett

On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:38 AM 9/18/09, biju.ctr.kurian at faa.gov wrote:

> Good morning Brett,
>
> My intention certainly wasn't to set your spider senses alight!  
> First and foremost, my motive in electing for an annual membership  
> in the JUG is to encourage involvement in while also contributing  
> constructively to JUG. There are ancillary exposure benefits that  
> factor into my decision, sure, but my main goal is to contribute  
> positively to both my team members' and local Java user's  
> professional development, as well as create additional exposure for  
> JUG to the local Java development community. I've personally seen a  
> great deal of benefit from involvement in JUG, for professional  
> development and perhaps more importantly team solidarity and  
> consensus. If the Steering Committee decides that Objectstream isn't  
> qualified to speak on certain topics, I have no problem with that; I  
> will still retain my commitment to JUG. I await the Steering  
> Committee's decision. Thanks, Brett.
>
>
> Biju
>
>
>
>
> -----"Brett L. Schuchert" <schuchert at yahoo.com> wrote: -----
>
> To: OKC JUG Steering Committee Mailing List <sc at lists.okcjug.org>
> From: "Brett L. Schuchert" <schuchert at yahoo.com>
> Date: 09/17/2009 06:43PM
> cc: Biju CTR Kurian/AMC/CNTR/FAA at FAA, OKC JUG Steering Committee  
> Mailing List <sc at lists.okcjug.org>
> Subject: Re: [Steering Committee] Annual JUG sponsorship
>
> One speaker quarter? That makes my spider senses tingle.
>
> He's taking both adversing time (fine) and presenter time. I don't  
> like that unless we allow for multiple speakers per month.
>
> Free tutorials:
>    http://schuchert.wikispaces.com
>
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Ryan Hoegg <ryan.hoegg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Biju, hello steering committee,
>
> I had lunch with Biju today to go over what an annual sponsorship  
> would look like.  We agreed that he would pay $1200 on January 1 for  
> a 2010 sponsorship.  He wasn't as interested in direct sponsorship  
> benefits as our recruiting sponsors have been, but he would like  
> ObjectStream branding on the web site and the standard three meeting  
> sponsorships we included with the recruiting sponsorship.  He'd also  
> like to provide one speaker per quarter next year.
>
> I invited Biju and his speaker(s) to attend our next steering  
> committee meeting so we could discuss topics.
>
> Biju, we really do appreciate your support.
>
> --
> Ryan Hoegg
> _______________________________________________
> sc mailing list
> sc at lists.okcjug.org
> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
> http://wiki.okcjug.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/sc-okcjug.org/attachments/20090918/0e857b64/attachment-0003.htm>