[Steering Committee] Status?

[Mitch Blevins]

Lucky for us, we had pre 2.x log4j and therefore avoided that bullet.

One more meeting sounds good.

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, 7:10 PM Paul Smith <paul0731 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I’d like to meet up again. I was just thinking about the JUG too.
>
> Ryan I tested and fixed our log4shell poo with python ;)
>
> Paul
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:38 AM Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd love to see more meetings. The sessions were helpful, but the people
>> were the best. :)
>>
>> Who wants to get together for lunch and hash things out? :P
>>
>> Ryan, I'll unlock the domain so you can transfer if you want.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:47 PM Ryan Hoegg <ryan.hoegg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not without a final farewell meeting at least! I did a bit of java
>>> recently when testing some things for log4j2 vulnerabilities... might make
>>> for an interesting talk. Really I valued seeing you folks through the
>>> years.  That and All American Pizza for lunch.
>>>
>>> My vote is for futureMeetings > 0.  Also I'd be happy to take over the
>>> domain, Jason.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:34 PM Brent Wilkins <brent.w.wilkins at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jason,
>>>>
>>>> I have often wondered if the JUG would ever return. I would love to see
>>>> it keep going but I'm open to what everyone thinks we should do.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 14:09 Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good afternoon, ladies and gents, and happy new year. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been getting some emails from various conferences, etc. talking
>>>>> about JUGs and active leaders, etc, which made me think of my favorite (if
>>>>> dormant) JUG, so I thought I'd do a status check. We haven't met in many,
>>>>> many moons for a number of reasons, the chief being COVID, I guess, and
>>>>> we're all busy, so before we know it, we're months, maybe even a couple of
>>>>> years without a meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> What should we do with the JUG? Currently, the only concrete part
>>>>> about the JUG is the domain. Our Techlahoma membership has lapsed, and it
>>>>> seems a lot of our leadership have moved on to non-Java technologies
>>>>> (traitors! :). Is the OKC JUG something we feel needs to be revived, or
>>>>> should we pour out a 40 of A&W and officially call it a day? I know there
>>>>> are many logistics that would have to be worked out for a revival, and that
>>>>> could be a lot of work, but, at the same time, many of us have put a lot of
>>>>> work into this thing over the years, so I don't want to see it just limp
>>>>> into history. If it does do that, it deserves a proper farewell. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> If we DON'T want to revive (which is fine. seriously), then I'm going
>>>>> to let this domain reg expire in June and save myself a whole $16/yr,
>>>>> though I'll probably just blow that on a date night with my wife. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way really is fine with me, but I wanted to make a semi-formal
>>>>> effort to see what others' thoughts were.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's all I have for now. I hope you all are doing well! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jason Lee
>>>>> http://jasondl.ee
>>>>> http://jasondl.ee/twitter
>>>>> http://jasondl.ee/in
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sc mailing list
>>>>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>>>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>>>>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>>>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sc mailing list
>>>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>>>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sc mailing list
>>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jason Lee
>> http://jasondl.ee
>> http://jasondl.ee/twitter
>> http://jasondl.ee/in
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc mailing list
>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sc mailing list
> sc at lists.okcjug.org
> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
> http://wiki.okcjug.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/sc-okcjug.org/attachments/20220128/8b66649e/attachment.htm>