[Steering Committee] Status?

[Jason Lee]

I'd love to see more meetings. The sessions were helpful, but the people
were the best. :)

Who wants to get together for lunch and hash things out? :P

Ryan, I'll unlock the domain so you can transfer if you want.

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:47 PM Ryan Hoegg <ryan.hoegg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not without a final farewell meeting at least! I did a bit of java
> recently when testing some things for log4j2 vulnerabilities... might make
> for an interesting talk. Really I valued seeing you folks through the
> years.  That and All American Pizza for lunch.
>
> My vote is for futureMeetings > 0.  Also I'd be happy to take over the
> domain, Jason.
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:34 PM Brent Wilkins <brent.w.wilkins at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Jason,
>>
>> I have often wondered if the JUG would ever return. I would love to see
>> it keep going but I'm open to what everyone thinks we should do.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022, 14:09 Jason Lee <jason at steeplesoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Good afternoon, ladies and gents, and happy new year. :)
>>>
>>> I've been getting some emails from various conferences, etc. talking
>>> about JUGs and active leaders, etc, which made me think of my favorite (if
>>> dormant) JUG, so I thought I'd do a status check. We haven't met in many,
>>> many moons for a number of reasons, the chief being COVID, I guess, and
>>> we're all busy, so before we know it, we're months, maybe even a couple of
>>> years without a meeting.
>>>
>>> What should we do with the JUG? Currently, the only concrete part about
>>> the JUG is the domain. Our Techlahoma membership has lapsed, and it seems a
>>> lot of our leadership have moved on to non-Java technologies (traitors! :).
>>> Is the OKC JUG something we feel needs to be revived, or should we pour out
>>> a 40 of A&W and officially call it a day? I know there are many logistics
>>> that would have to be worked out for a revival, and that could be a lot of
>>> work, but, at the same time, many of us have put a lot of work into this
>>> thing over the years, so I don't want to see it just limp into history. If
>>> it does do that, it deserves a proper farewell. :)
>>>
>>> If we DON'T want to revive (which is fine. seriously), then I'm going to
>>> let this domain reg expire in June and save myself a whole $16/yr, though
>>> I'll probably just blow that on a date night with my wife. :)
>>>
>>> Either way really is fine with me, but I wanted to make a semi-formal
>>> effort to see what others' thoughts were.
>>>
>>> That's all I have for now. I hope you all are doing well! :)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason Lee
>>> http://jasondl.ee
>>> http://jasondl.ee/twitter
>>> http://jasondl.ee/in
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sc mailing list
>>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc mailing list
>> sc at lists.okcjug.org
>> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
>> http://wiki.okcjug.org
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sc mailing list
> sc at lists.okcjug.org
> http://lists.okcjug.org/listinfo.cgi/sc-okcjug.org
> http://wiki.okcjug.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/okcjug/
>


-- 
Jason Lee
http://jasondl.ee
http://jasondl.ee/twitter
http://jasondl.ee/in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okcjug.org/pipermail/sc-okcjug.org/attachments/20220128/3e919451/attachment-0001.htm>